Why do we think the “head-pastor” is the only one who can really teach us anything about Scripture and God?
Related Posts
Why care about the CBF? – Response
David Roach has written an article published at the Baptist Press titled, Why care about the CBF?. Roach describes a recent experience he had when visiting the CBF’s General Assembly….
Sex Offenders & Church
I was sitting this morning, enjoying one of the best boxed (or bagged?) muffins that I have had in a while. I was listening to the news on ABC, when…
Speck Candyshell Review
[youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FXa4MPy1aDA] Check out Speck’s website for more information about their cases and other products. I purchased mine from TechNGnet at Amazon.
Sitting, Standing, Walking – is that really the point?
Every Wednesday night we are discussing Christology (the Study of Christ). This past Wednesday night we were discussing his ascension to Heaven. During this discussion someone brought up Hebrews 8:1…
Experiencing the Church… – Part 1
I had a pretty great experience with the Church this weekend. The group we normally call “Sunday School” met Saturday night in a house. We ate taco’s, my wife made…
Question of the Week – #21
This question is the last one of the year, and will probably the final question in this series. It is also a question that will lead into a little series…
Because many people think of studying and teaching Scripture (as well as pastoring) to be a vocation.
i don’t think that so i must not be part of the group you are addressing this question to but i think that OTHER PEOPLE think that because they see the pastor just like every other professional and bible study just like any other profession. you have to be trained and they pay the guy who is trained to do it. that way they dont have to do it.
FYI, too all my readers… the “comment deleted” by author was Dan’s comment. He deleted it because on his second to last sentence he had typed, “you have to be trained and we pay the guy who is trained to do it.” (emphasis added)
This is important because Dan always gets mad at me for using “we” in my Question’s of the Week. Note how he put “OTHER PEOPLE” in all caps. This was an attempt to prove that my use of “we” is not valid.
I mentioned it to him and he deleted his comment and retyped it with “they” instead of “we.”
Thanks Dan!
Lew
all lies
Are we angry?
I think it’s a textual variant, actually, and I’m going to start an entire denomination now based on Dan’s use of the word “we” instead of “they”. It’s obvious that he changed the wording under pressure from Lew, and therefore “we” is what was actually “inspired” and in the original autograph.
Never mind that the original is now lost to us. We can construct it from the evidence and consider it completely inerrant and infallible.