Why do we associate OT priests with pastors and temple/tabernacle with church building? (HT: Alan)
I have been thinking about my last post, specifically about what the implications are of this interpretation. As many of you know I attend SEBTS College. We have an office…
Last week I was asked to teach a Sunday School lesson for one of our brothers. They just started going through the letter we call 1 Corinthians and he asked…
So, a friend of mine commented on the absurdity of Jessica Simpson complaining that she hasn’t been able to marry her man yet because he keeps getting her knocked up……
Q: Directed to Robinson – If Peter is the source of Mark’s Gospel, why would Mark record that Peter did not believe if Luke recorded that Peter did believe?A: That…
Over the past few weeks I have written on the topic of Christians and the Government. In these posts I discussed my current (and ever changing) views about how I…
The other day I was having a conversation with someone about a comic strip. We were discussing the possibility of God impressing on someones heart to extend the invitation because…
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
My guess is b/c it makes for a good analogy more than anything. This would be in contrast to the idea that they really DO serve the same function. I don’t think that they do. Similar fuctions…yes…but I think that they are more dissimilar than most people realize.
Hi! I’ve followed you from Alan’s blog. I recently set up a feed reader, so I’m able to more easily keep track of many more blogs, including yours. :)
I think part of the answer is that we don’t understand that the Old Covenant is not the New Covenant, and we don’t fully understand the types and shadows in the O.C. I honestly think that many people really don’t have a clue about how the O.C. priests had been selected, what exactly it is that they did, and how their function was not a type or shadow of “church leaders,” but rather a type and shadow of the perfect sacrifice of Jesus. And how the tabernacle was not a type or shadow of a “church building” but rather of our life in Christ, dwelling as one with God.
I’m being very general, but I’m looking mainly at Hebrews 8 and 9.
Rhea
Thanks for the comment. I think they are very dissimilar, in fact, I sense that my understanding of the OT system is similar to what Joel is eluding to.
Joel
Thanks for adding me to your reader. As I previously stated, I sense that our interpretations are very similar. I would continue to Hebrews 10 also.
Thanks again every Rhea and Joel.
God’s Glory,
Lew
Even though I helped develop this question, I think the answer is fairly easy. We think the OT structures and priestly hierarchy apply to the church because of our (Protestants’) common Catholic heritage. We primarily get our understanding of church leadership from our Catholic fore-fathers.
-Alan
Lew,
I’ve had you in my bookmarks for quite some time now, and I don’t know why I’ve never used a reader until now, because it’s definitely much more convenient than loading full bookmarked pages to see if anyone’s posted anything new. Anyway, that’s off the subject…
I agree that chapter 10 should be included in this. In fact the writer’s talk of the priesthood goes back to chapters 6 & 7 as well.
Really, you asked a great question because so much of how “church” is done these days revolves around a very skewed view of priests and the tabernacle. I now feel like going on a rant about the “tithes” (brought up in chapter 7) and the “storehouse” (of Deuteronomy, Malachi, etc.), but I won’t do that :D and I’ll just say that I think it goes along with all of this and I hope and pray that Christians today will wake up and smell the wonderful aroma of the New Covenant and stop eating from the old stale one!