Why do we think the “head-pastor” is the only one who can really teach us anything about Scripture and God?
Related Posts
The Kingdom of Heaven is like… – Part 3
The second parable given is the Parable of the Mustard Seed. This parable is smaller and easier to manage than the previous parable because it has fewer elements involved. He…
Review: The Shack – Subversion
Challies review is broken into several sections. The first four sections are an introduction of The Shack, a summary of the The Shack, a discussion of how fact vs. fiction…
To Florida and Back Again
Day 1 – The Drive Down My friend Paul got hitched to his lady Carrie at the end of February. Paul and I have known each other since the womb…
Beagles vs. Bulldogs
Why choose, when you can have the best of both worlds? Yes… we are those people…
Original or Not? (Keith Elliott)
Think Mark did not intend to end his gospel at Mark 16:8, but that his original ending was lost. Introductory Remarks – Missing beginning and ends of ancient manuscripts did…
Top 10 Healthiest Boar’s Head Deli Meats
I eat about 4 oz of Boar’s Head Deli meat four times a week. So I decided to find out which of their tasty delights are the healthiest for me…
6 Comments
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
Because many people think of studying and teaching Scripture (as well as pastoring) to be a vocation.
i don’t think that so i must not be part of the group you are addressing this question to but i think that OTHER PEOPLE think that because they see the pastor just like every other professional and bible study just like any other profession. you have to be trained and they pay the guy who is trained to do it. that way they dont have to do it.
FYI, too all my readers… the “comment deleted” by author was Dan’s comment. He deleted it because on his second to last sentence he had typed, “you have to be trained and we pay the guy who is trained to do it.” (emphasis added)
This is important because Dan always gets mad at me for using “we” in my Question’s of the Week. Note how he put “OTHER PEOPLE” in all caps. This was an attempt to prove that my use of “we” is not valid.
I mentioned it to him and he deleted his comment and retyped it with “they” instead of “we.”
Thanks Dan!
Lew
all lies
Are we angry?
I think it’s a textual variant, actually, and I’m going to start an entire denomination now based on Dan’s use of the word “we” instead of “they”. It’s obvious that he changed the wording under pressure from Lew, and therefore “we” is what was actually “inspired” and in the original autograph.
Never mind that the original is now lost to us. We can construct it from the evidence and consider it completely inerrant and infallible.